bigscarybotpilot: (Default)

[personal profile] bigscarybotpilot 2025-09-10 12:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes?

It would be an innocent tone, if ART was remotely capable of sounding innocent. It, at best, is capable of 'pretending not to know what this is about and waiting for you to initiate your request/complaint/stupid illogical processing of the situation.' It would probably claim that it was good for Murderbot to vocalize its feelings and learn how to communicate its needs in ways other than sulking, but in reality it's probably just being kind of an asshole.
bigscarybotpilot: (Default)

[personal profile] bigscarybotpilot 2025-09-10 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)
They are.

There is a pause of a few seconds- deliberate, obviously, ART hardly needs the time to consider what it's going to say or how to respond to that. Murderbot may well get the impression that it is thoroughly enjoying itself.

It is a common vocal stim from young children; I would consider it fortunate that this is the one they use when they are experiencing positive emotions as opposed to negative ones.

Yes, it could be worse.
Edited 2025-09-10 20:32 (UTC)
bigscarybotpilot: (Default)

[personal profile] bigscarybotpilot 2025-09-10 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Dr. Mensah has children. I had assumed you were familiar.

That, at least, is probably true. Doesn't mean it's not getting a kick out of seeing that that assessment was wrong.

ART can't snort or express its derision in any sort of verbal fashion, but it's also not hard to sense through the feed. Firstly, they need access to most areas of the ship as they are onboard in order to acquaint themselves to the different mechanisms, it says, Secondly, there isn't a good reason to deny them access, or at least not one that would involve sharing more information than any of us would want. These students don't know what ART is, after all, that still being pretty confidential information. And they presumably don't know what Murderbot is, either.
Edited 2025-09-10 23:38 (UTC)
bigscarybotpilot: (Default)

[personal profile] bigscarybotpilot 2025-09-11 01:04 pm (UTC)(link)
You are being ridiculous. There are 56 teenagers aboard at the present moment, with 8 adults not including either of us or Three. That is nowhere near 'hundreds.'

Yes it knows that's not the point. It doesn't care.

Would you like me to develop an educational module for them on how not to annoy rogue SecUnits? The risk here is that, while ART's tone is very dry, it's probably already rifling through things in the background and beginning to assemble such a thing.
bigscarybotpilot: (Default)

[personal profile] bigscarybotpilot 2025-09-11 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)
ART doesn't reply, just drops a file into the feed; it's a module/powerpoint titled 'Draft: How Not To Annoy Security Consultant Eden'.

If Murderbot deigns to open it, it will find there are multiple slides with varying titles- "Avoiding Security Consultant Eden," "How To Interact with Security Consultant Eden (When Unable to Avoid)," "How To Interact with Security Consultant Eden (When Needed for Security Reasons), and "Why it is a Bad Idea to Touch Security Consultant Eden."
Edited 2025-09-11 23:36 (UTC)
bigscarybotpilot: (Default)

[personal profile] bigscarybotpilot 2025-09-12 02:04 pm (UTC)(link)
There's a slight pause, and the document is updated: "Draft: How Not To Annoy The Security Consultants Eden Aboard Perihelion."

It has also started filling in the various slides; under 'Avoiding' there is a note to not going looking for them in their rooms, which seems mostly a not-so-subtle reminder that they can, in fact, retreat to the rooms ART made sure they didn't have to share. (Well, other than each other- ART would have very much liked to make sure that it could chill and watch media with Murderbot without Three necessarily being around but there simply wasn't a way to make that work.)
bigscarybotpilot: (Default)

[personal profile] bigscarybotpilot 2025-09-13 08:16 pm (UTC)(link)
ART more or less immediately fixes the font to be unbolded and in a normal size.

They are extremely unlikely to attempt to hug you unless you manage to endear yourself to them, it informs Murderbot dryly, At present I see very little risk of that happening.

Have you considered being nice to the children, Murderbot. Or at least less... this.
bigscarybotpilot: (Default)

[personal profile] bigscarybotpilot 2025-09-13 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Back to normal font!

Those are their friends. I shall reiterate, unless you suddenly decide to make friends with them, I would rate likelihood of them trying to hug you at approximately 1.3%. Frankly, it feels like that number is generous.

It's also filling in other areas, filling in things about staying in designated areas (for safety reasons and also for avoiding Murderbot purposes), not trying to force eye contact, and to not be alarmed if the security consultants just turn and face a wall while waiting for them to pass by.
bigscarybotpilot: (Default)

[personal profile] bigscarybotpilot 2025-09-14 12:28 am (UTC)(link)
Back to normal, almost too quickly. It's just showing off now.

Oh, that is a consideration it needs to make. ART is more likely to try and be friendly with humans, or at least the ones associated with his humans or the university. Murderbot meanwhile seems to just... acquire humans.

Unless we experience some sort of security incident, it amends, the likelihood remains at 1.3%. Security incidents tend to show much Murderbot actually cares, after all.
bigscarybotpilot: (Default)

[personal profile] bigscarybotpilot 2025-09-14 12:48 am (UTC)(link)
Back to normal. ART is content in the knowledge that it can do this forever, and Murderbot will give up eventually.

A large scale security incident, 1.2%, ART answers; because of how statistics works, it's actually higher thanks to the recent, other incidents they have been involved in. They actually are still well within reach of other ships and contact with the university, so there would hopefully not be anything too terrible. A security incident involving a small number of onboard participants with no outside influence would be 23.4%." Because... teenagers. But that could also just be a heated argument that needs An Adult.
bigscarybotpilot: (Default)

[personal profile] bigscarybotpilot 2025-09-14 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
whoops html broke a little that last bit wasn't supposed to be italics it's fiiiine

Changed back. It considers embedding it as it is into the file to stop Murderbot from even being able to change it, but that's not as much fun.

ART more or less immediately re-titles the slide to 'Steps To Take To Avoid Onboard Security Incidents,' and begins rephrasing things to be less patronizing and/or full of swear words and deleting anything it would prefer the students not even think about.
bigscarybotpilot: (Default)

[personal profile] bigscarybotpilot 2025-09-15 03:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Changed back, while also continuing to add things in other slides.

A few reasons, mostly concerning the fact that these are young adults and not small children, and therefore this sort of thing is something they already know not to do, ART answers, Past a certain age, the only time humans are likely to behave in that level of self-destructive behavior is if they are inebriated, which is forbidden for the students aboard. In most cases they would also have needed to take steps to access my mechanics and I would prefer they not even have that idea in their heads. If you don't tell them the option exists, they might not think about it on their own.
bigscarybotpilot: (Default)

[personal profile] bigscarybotpilot 2025-09-16 06:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Changed back.

They do, but again, they have already been told not to and none of the students have access to my mechanisms anyway. Besides, I am also watching them if they attempt to do so. Please give the humans some credit. And ART, for that matter.
bigscarybotpilot: (Default)

[personal profile] bigscarybotpilot 2025-09-17 01:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh that's cute. ART undoes it, changes it, and implements Murderbot's own code with some minor changes.

I can override all attempts to access my mechanisms, ART affirms, Including the manual overrides, which already would require codes none of the student possess. Baring any- Pause. -major malfunctions or absence- Such as being deleted, which it does not want to bring up. yes, I am sure.
bigscarybotpilot: (Default)

[personal profile] bigscarybotpilot 2025-09-17 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
If you don't want it to use your code, don't try uselessly to code things in its way! It changes it back, with its own code this time, escalating in difficulty.

That is the plan. ART would also very much like to avoid any situation like that happening ever again.

It will work away at their slides a bit more before pinging SecUnit with a new media series. It can easily focus on both at the same time, after all (among everything else it's doing).
bigscarybotpilot: (Default)

[personal profile] bigscarybotpilot 2025-09-18 12:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Haha, it's winning. It knew it would, and there's definitely an air of smugness in the feed as the SecUnit struggles with the hack.

Still, it will happily settle in to watch the new series with it, quietly adding and editing the document. It's starting to look like an actual education module. Now, whether or not it will actually use it...